Cic edizioni internazionali
Oral Implantology

Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report

Case report, 25 - 36
doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution.
Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.

Vol. XI (No. 4) 2018 October-December

  1. CLINICAL EFFECTS OF LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI PROBIOTIC IN TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS. A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Costacurta M., Sicuro L., Margiotta S., Ingrasciotta I., Docimo R.
  2. BONE AUGMENTATION BY PERIOSTEUM EXTENSION USING 3-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY NICKEL-TITANIUM MESH SHEETS
    Tsutsui T., Moroi A., Yoshizawa K., Hotta A., Hiraide R., Takayama A., Tsunoda T., Saito Y., Sato M., Aikawa Y., Sakamoto H., Ueki K.
  3. DENTOSKELETAL EFFECTS OF THE BITEJUMPING APPLIANCE AND THE TWIN-BLOCK APPLIANCE IN THE TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II MALOCCLUSION: A RETROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Tepedino M., Cretella Lombardo E., Nota A., Tecco S., Cozza P., Pavoni C.
  4. THE ROLE OF CBCT IN THE TRACTION OF BILATERAL MAXILLARY IMPACTED CANINES WITH ADJACENT LATERAL INCISORS ROOTS RESORPTED: CASE REPORT
    Fusaroli D., Danesi C., Laganà G., Mucedero M.
  5. EVALUATION OF PROSTHETIC QUALITY AND MASTICATORY EFFICIENCY IN PATIENTS WITH TOTAL REMOVABLE PROSTHESIS: STUDY OF 12 CASES
    Corsalini M., Di Venere D., Sportelli P., Magazzino D., Ripa C., Cantatore F., Cagnetta G., De Rinaldis C., Montemurro N., De Giacomo A., Laforgia A., Rapone B.
  6. FREE FLAPS FOR HEAD-AND-NECK RECONSTRUCTION: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE
    Beltramini G.A., Segna E., Bolzoni A.R., Rossi D.S., Cherchi A., Nuti M., Baj A.
  7. HISTOLOGIC AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MAXILLARY SINUS AUGMENTATION WITH DIFFERENT BIOMATERIALS. A PILOT SPLIT-MOUTH HUMAN STUDY
    Mummolo S., Nota A., Marchetti E., Capuano S., Tecco S., Marzo G., Campanella V.
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report
    Spinelli D., Ottria L., De Vico G., Bollero R., Barlattani Jr., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
credits