Cic edizioni internazionali
Oral Implantology

Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report

Case report, 25 - 36
doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution.
Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.

Vol. X (No. 4) 2017 October - December

  1. IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTIONS ON SINGLE CROWNS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Ceruso F.M., Barnaba P., Mazzoleni S., Ottria L., Gargari M., Zucon A., Bruno G., Di Fiore A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349
  2. DENTAL UNIT WASTEWATER, A CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM: A SISTEMATIC REVIEW
    Cataldi M.E., Al Rakayan S., Arcuri C., Arcuri C., Condò R.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.354
  3. IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE POST-SPACE DEPTH READING WITH AN INTRAORAL SCANNER (IOS) COMPARED TO A TRADITIONAL SILICON IMPRESSION
    Pinto A., Arcuri L., Carosi P., Nardi R., Libonati A., Ottria L., Campanella V.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360
  4. STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS DESIGNS OF PROSTHESES ON SHORT IMPLANTS OR STANDARD IMPLANTS IN POSTERIOR MAXILLA: A THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Jomjunyong K., Rungsiyakull P., Rungsiyakull C., Aunmeungtong W., Chantaramungkorn M., Khongkunthian P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.369
  5. EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED ANESTHETIC DELIVERY SYSTEM (STA™) IN DENTAL IMPLANT SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Grassi F.R., Rapone B., Scarano Catanzaro F., Corsalini M., Kalemaj Z.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.381
  6. IDENTIFICATION OF ORAL RISK FACTORS FOR CHRONIC GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE IN HAEMATOLOGICAL PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT ALLOGENEIC HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
    Picardi A., Miranda M., Liciani F., Paterno G., Arcese W., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.390
  7. THERAPEUTIC EFFICIENCY OF PLATELET GEL FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL ULCERS RELATED TO CHRONIC GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE AFTER ALLOGENEIC HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
    Picardi A., Ferraro A.S., Miranda M., Meconi F., Lanti A., Adorno G., Arcese W., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.398
  8. LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF MUSCLE-SKELET PAIN IN PATIENTS AFFECTED BY TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS
    Basili M., Barlattani jr. A., Venditti A., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.406
  9. EFFECTS OF THE APPLICATION OF HIGH-PRESSURE OXYGEN ON THE TREATMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN DIABETIC PATIENTS
    Sabatini S., Ricci M., Candotto V., Lauritano D., Nardi G.M.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.412
  10. CORRELATION BETWEEN CORONAL AND APICAL ARCH FORM AND DEGREE OF DIVERGENCE: A VOLUMETRIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
    Lombardo L., Veronesi F., Candotto V., Nardone M., Siciliani G.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.424
  11. CEMENT LAYER THICKNESS AND SHEAR STRESS RESISTANCE IN CYLINDRICAL DOWEL SPACES: PULL-OUT TEST
    Andreasi Bassi M., Lauritano D., Brizzi M., Andrisani C., Lico S., Candotto V.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.439
  12. UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMA: REHABILITATION WITH CHIN GRAFT HARVESTED AND IMPLANT-SUPPORTED FIXED PROSTHESIS
    Sanz-Alonso J., Martinez-Rodriguez N., Martin-Ares M., Barona-Dorado C., Cortés Breton-Brinkmann J., Martinez-Gonazales J.M.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.448
  13. POSITIONING OF A CONTEXTUAL IMPLANT ALONG WITH A SINUS LIFT ANCHORED WITH A BLOCK OF HETEROLOGOUS BONE
    Secondo F., Grottoli C.F., Zollino I., Perale G., Lauritano D.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.457
  14. CLINICAL AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC OUTCOME IN FUTURE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERFORMED WITH A NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE THROUGH HYDRAULIC SINUS LIFT TECHNIQUE
    Andreasi Bassi M., Lopez M.A., Confalone L., Lauritano D., Candotto V.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.468
  15. “ALL ON SHORT” PROSTHETIC-IMPLANT SUPPORTED REHABILITATIONS
    Falisi G., Bernardi S., Rastelli C., Pietrapaoli D., De Angelis F., Frascaria M., Di Paolo C.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.477
  16. BONE REGENERATION IN AESTHETIC AREAS USING TITANIUM MICROMESH. THREE CASE REPORTS
    Scarano A., Assenza B., Di Cerbo A., Candotto V., Santos De Oliveira P., Lorusso F.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.488
  17. AN UNUSUAL, DECEPTIVE DELAYED OF PROFUSE HAEMORRHAGE AFTER MANDIBULAR IMPLANT DENTISTRY: RISK PLANNING AND MEDICO-LEGAL INSTRUCTION
    Gaudio R.M., El Haddad G., El Haddad G., Lauritano D., Carinci F.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.495
  18. POLYSONOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION IN A CASE OF MODERATE OSAS TREATED WITH MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT DEVICE
    Venditti A., Basili M., Ragazzoni F.M., Barlattani jr. A., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.502
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report
    Spinelli D., Ottria L., De Vico G., Bollero R., Barlattani Jr., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
credits