Cic edizioni internazionali
Oral Implantology

Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report

Case report, 25 - 36
doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution.
Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.

Vol. X (No. 1) 2017 January-March

  1. EFFICACY OF A NEW COATING OF IMPLANTABUTMENT CONNECTIONS IN REDUCING BACTERIAL LOADING: AN IN VITRO STUDY
    Lauritano D., Bignozzi C.A., Pazzi D., Cura F., Carinci F.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.001
  2. NEW INSIGHTS IN OROFACIAL CLEFT: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC STUDIES ON ITALIAN SAMPLES
    Tettamanti L., Avantaggiato A., Nardone M., Palmieri A., Tagliabue A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.011
  3. GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON A LARGE ITALIAN SAMPLE
    Tettamanti L., Gaudio R.M., Iapichino A., Mucchi D., Tagliabue A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.020
  4. PREVALENCE OF PERIODONTAL PATHOGENS AMONG ITALIAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON 2992 PATIENTS
    Tettamanti L., Gaudio R.M., Cura F., Mucchi D., Illuzzi N., Tagliabue A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.028
  5. APPLICATIONS OF BIOMATERIALS FOR BONE AUGMENTATION OF JAWS: CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND IN VITRO STUDIES
    Tettamanti L., Andrea Bassi M., Trapella G., Candotto V., Tagliabue A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.037
  6. CLEFT PALATE ONLY: CURRENT CONCEPTS
    Tettamanti L., Avantaggiato A., Nardone M., Silvestre-Rangil J., Tagliabue A.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.045
  7. THREE-POINT BENDING TEST SIMULATION ON IMPLANT FPDS WITH A BIO-FAITHFUL MODEL
    Vertucci V., Montani M., Arcuri C., Cardelli P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.053
  8. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTI-INFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF MOUTHRINSE CONTAINING TEA TREE OIL
    Salvatori C., Barchi L., Guzzo F., Gargari M.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.059
  9. POSTEXTRACTION COMPUTER-GUIDED IMPLANT SURGERY IN PARTIALLY EDENTATE PATIENTS WITH METAL RESTORATIONS: A CASE REPORT
    Pinto A., Raffone C.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.071
  10. CORRELATION BETWEEN PARODONTAL INDEXES AND ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS: PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN A GROUP OF 16 PATIENTS
    Di Venere D., Pettini F., Nardi G.M., La Forgia A., Stefanachi G., Notaro V., Rapone B., Grassi F.R., Corsalini M.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician® and procera implant bridge®: case report
    Spinelli D., Ottria L., De Vico G., Bollero R., Barlattani Jr., Bollero P.
    doi: 10.11138/orl/2013.6.2.025
credits