Stability changes of implants placed with high insertion torque: a prospective clinical trial



Purpose: To evaluate the changes in implant stability during a 12-week healing period, as assessed by the resonance frequency analysis (RFA), when implants are placed with high insertion torque.
Materials and Methods: From October 2019 to April 2020, 56 implants were included in the study. All implants were placed in healed ridges. Care was taken to properly undersize the osteotomy to obtain a high insertion torque. Using the RFA method, measurements of implant stability quotient (ISQ) were made at implant placement and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks during the non-submerged healing period. Four measurements for each implant at each time interval were recorded, 2 in the bucco-lingual direction and 2 in the mesio-distal direction.
Results: Average insertion torque for the 56 implants was 72.41±8.89 Ncm. The average ISQ values were 74.72±4.08, 73.19±4.91, 73.51±4.86, 74.55±4.97, and 75.43±5.14 at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks respectively. The slight average decrease of 1.53 ISQ units at 3 weeks was statistically significant (-p-value=0.036). A significant gradual increase occurred between the 3rd and the 12th week (-p-value =0.017). No difference was found between baseline and 12 weeks (-p-value= 0.361). Not all implants lost ISQ units at 3 weeks. While 36 implants lost an average of 4.64 ISQ units (-p-value <0.0001) at 3 weeks, 20 implants gained an average of 4.07 units at the same time interval (-p-value <0.0001). Conclusions: Implant stability was relatively maintained at high ISQ levels throughout the 12 weeks period. This study suggests that high peri-implant bone strain achieved during a high insertion torque implant placement is not deleterious to implant stability, but on the contrary it keeps the implant continuously stable throughout the healing period.

Share on



Rawad Samarani

How to Cite
Samarani, R. . (2021). Stability changes of implants placed with high insertion torque: a prospective clinical trial. Oral & Implantology, 14(1), 1–14. Retrieved from
  • Abstract viewed - 39 times