Cic edizioni internazionali
Oral Implantology

PROGNOSIS OF SHORT IMPLANTS IN ORAL REHABILITATION: WHERE DO WE STAND TODAY?

Review, 60 - 73
Tag this article
Abstract
Full text PDF
Objective. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the long-term prognosis of short-length implants (≤ 6 mm) placed in the posterior maxilla and to review their clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes based on prospective randomized controlled trials. Materials and methods. An electronic MEDLINE (PubMed) search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials comparing short implants (≤ 6 mm) to longer implants (≥ 6 mm) placed in the posterior maxilla with or without sinus elevation procedures. The studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were eliminated. Patient, implant and prosthesis information were filled/gathered in tables and a systematic review was performed on the clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes. Results. Eight RCTs were selected for the study and a total of 409 short implants placed in 260 patients and 422 longer (≥ 6 mm) implants in 252 patients were analyzed. Out of all these included implants, 20 short and 8 long were lost after 3 to 5-year follow-up. Both groups showed high survival rates ranging between 86.7% and 100% for group short and between 95.6% and 100% for group long. Biological complications mainly occurred in group long where augmentation procedures were performed. The short implant group showed more favorable outcomes in terms of PROM levels, post-operative morbidity as well as surgical time and cost. Conclusion. The findings of the present systematic review suggest that short implants may be considered a promising option/ alternative for posterior maxilla rehabilitation especially in elderly or medically compromised patients where augmentation procedures should be avoided or at least simplified.

Vol. XII (No. 1) 2019 January-March

  1. INFERENTIAL ANALYSIS OF BIG DATA IN REAL-TIME: ONE GIANT LEAP FOR SPATIOTEMPORAL DIGITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY IN DENTISTRY
    Al-Imam A.
  2. POLY(ɛ-CAPROLACTONE) MEMBRANES COATED WITH POLY(4-STYRENESULFONIC ACID-CO-MALEIC ACID)-SODIUM SALT ENHANCE OSTEOGENIC PROPERTIES OF PRE-OSTEOBLASTS MC3T3-E1
    Angwarawong T., Kanjanamekanant K., Angwaravong O., Pavasant P.
  3. FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CANTILEVERED FRAMEWORKS IN COMPLETE ARCH-PROSTHESES SUPPORTED BY TILTED OR PARALLEL IMPLANTS
    De Francesco M., Di Fiore A., Bruno G., Gargari M., Martelli M., Barnaba P., Marino M., Quercia A., Ceruso F.M.
  4. RARE CASE OF INVERTED IMPACTED CANINE IN INFRA-ORBITARY POSITION REQUIRING SURGICAL THERAPY
    Falisi G., Cutilli T., Rastelli E., Bernardi S., Continenza M.A., Vittorini Velasquez P., Severino M.
  5. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL BONE REGENERATION
    Ciulli E., Fabretti M., Casale F., Lanzuolo S., Gargari M.
  6. ORTHODONTIC EXTRUSION FOR PRE-IMPLANT SITE ENHANCEMENT IN A POSTERIOR AREA: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CASE REPORT
    Giannetti L., Consolo U., Vecci F., Apponi R.
  7. PROGNOSIS OF SHORT IMPLANTS IN ORAL REHABILITATION: WHERE DO WE STAND TODAY?
    Rameh S., Menhall A., Younes R.
  8. FRACTURES OF CROWN, ROOT AND AVULSION OF PERMANENT TEETH: CASE REPORT OF COMPLEX TRAUMATIC DENTAL INJURIES
    Di Taranto V., Severino M., Agrestini C., Barlattani A.
  9. ECC FULL REHABILITATION WITH INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS: A CASE REPORT
    Gallusi G., Severino M., Cardelli P., Barlattani jr. A.
  10. DIRECT ADHESIVE REHABILITATION WITH DOUBLE INDEX TECHNIQUE: A CASE REPORT
    Libonati A., Severino M., Dolci A., Barlattani A.
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. PROGNOSIS OF SHORT IMPLANTS IN ORAL REHABILITATION: WHERE DO WE STAND TODAY?
    Rameh S., Menhall A., Younes R.
credits